This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Mohan's Outstanding Patches (was Re: Patch: java.net win32 - removing unused code)


(And I mean "outstanding" in a they're-not-in-yet sense.)

> > - someone approve these two as-is:
> > 
> >   - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00283.html
> >   - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00390.html
> > 
> >     We can always quibble about whether we use _Jv_AllocBytes()
> >     or _Jv_Malloc() later.
> > 
> > - then I redo this in terms of the above two and resubmit:
> > 
> >   - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00111.html
> > 
> > - then someone approves the above
> > 
> > - then I can check these in and DISABLE_JAVA_NET will be
> >   gone forever. I'd need to slightly modify my cleanup patch
> >   before checking it in.
>
>Go ahead.
>
>Andrew.

I checked these in:

- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00283.html
- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00390.html

...and redid the attached MinGW networking/cleanup patch
in terms of the above two. The only other slight change is that
I moved the jvm.h include into win32.h and out of all of the
nat*Win32.cc files.

Tom said he wouldn't be doing a deeper review of this and Ranjit
and Michael said that they were okay with the previous variant.
Okay for liftoff?

If so, my last remaining patch is this one:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00427.html

If both of these are approved, I'll celebrate by putting out a
fresh MinGW build and announcing to the world that it built
straight from CVS.

-- Mohan
http://www.thisiscool.com/
http://www.animalsong.org/

Attachment: w32clnet.tar.bz2
Description: application/bzip2


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]