This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [libava/win32]: Don't add dll[im/ex]port attributes to libgcj,unless dll build


On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Mohan Embar wrote:
> >>> I actually prefer the .def file option discussed here:
> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-08/msg00076.html
>
> To my naive eyes, requiring a separate .DEF file for such matters
> would create a dual-maintenance issue. I realize that the number
> of exported functions is relatively static, but I don't see harm in such
> macros, even if a different macro is needed for CNI-related exports
> vs. JNI-related exports.

I suppose a .def file is the analog of ELF version scripts.  Libgcj
will likely have the latter anyway sometime after binary compatibility is
done.

Jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]