This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: dl_iterate_phdr() deadlock patch


Boehm, Hans writes:

 > I checked in the patch a while ago (Mar. 4).  If you're still
 > seeing problems, that's news to me.  Please post details.  Is this
 > still a deadlock?  For a dynamically linked executable?  Can you
 > send gdb stack traces?

It could be that the test just runs for a log time rather than
actually failing.  I'll investigate further.

Andrew.

 > > -----Original Message-----
 > > From: Andrew Haley [mailto:aph at redhat dot com]
 > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 11:25 AM
 > > To: Boehm, Hans
 > > Cc: 'tromey at redhat dot com'; 'java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org'
 > > Subject: RE: dl_iterate_phdr() deadlock patch
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Boehm, Hans writes:
 > >  > A quick status update:
 > >  > 
 > >  > I checked the patch into the trunk.
 > >  > 
 > >  > I then decided to run SPECjbb on X86 as one last test before
 > >  > checking it into 3.3.  That failed.  It turns out that
 > >  > dl_iterate_phdr() apparently doesn't issue a callback for the main
 > >  > executable in a completely statically linked program, though it
 > >  > appears to do so if the program is linked against any dynamic
 > >  > libraries.
 > >  > 
 > >  > I am generating a small patch to work around this.  Unless I hear
 > >  > otherwise, I will check the result into 3.3 very soon, and update
 > >  > the trunk correspondingly.
 > > 
 > > No luck yet?  I'm still getting failures on 3.3 branch.
 > > 
 > > Andrew.
 > > 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]