Re: [PATCH] to java::lang::ConcreteProcess::destroy

[Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>]

Ronald Landheer-Cieslak writes:
 > The Makefile defines NO_SIGNALS when there is no signal support for the 
 > current target. In fact, it tried to compile the file with -DNO_SIGNALS as 
 > an option, and the compile broke on the kill() (which is rather logical if 
 > you don't have signals) so I patched it up like this and it worked like a 
 > charm :)
 > Might leave a couple of zombies around if there are no signals, though..

I think we're confused about what system has no signals but has
processes.  Wel, I certainly am.

Andrew.