This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] undef MPROTECT_VDB for darwin?

From: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
Cc: java-patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:22:57 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] undef MPROTECT_VDB for darwin?
References: <75A9FEBA25015040A761C1F74975667DA13678@hplex4.hpl.hp.com>

Boehm, Hans wrote:

That's fine.  Andrew and Tom had concluded that it would make sense to reintegrate my latest tree into the gcc tree.  But it wasn't completely clear that someone with the right CVS expertise had the time to do so.  This would also get fixed as part of such a merge.

There are of course still problems with Darwin threads and dynamic libraries ...

Hm, do they really plan also on 3.3? If not it would be a little step towards a cleaning up.

I know there are things with darwin, at least I tried the latest tar and the dylib was built :)

On some libgcj testcases I get spurious failures which end in boehm-gc. FileHandleGcTest.

I could help testing if you need some results.

So I wait until this merge will happen.

Thanks,
Andreas

References:
- RE: [PATCH] undef MPROTECT_VDB for darwin?
  - From: Boehm, Hans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]