This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:43:03 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
References: <87n0lkr7as.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><15927.45068.386247.482731@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><87el6vrems.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Andrew> I would have used flag-syntax-only instead of
 > Andrew> flag_emit_class_files, but I don't suppose it matters.  We
 > Andrew> seem to randomly use one or the other.
 > 
 > I think the bug would still occur with flag-syntax-only, since in this
 > case that flag would be 0.

I don't think so.

$ gcj -C -v Smu.java

[ ... ]
/local/aph/head/install/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4/jc1 Smu.java -quiet [ ... ] -fsyntax-only -femit-class-files -o /dev/null

So flag-syntax-only is probably a better choice than
flag_emit_class_files, since it works in both cases.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Patch: gcj and rhug build regression
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]