This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: BigInteger.modInverse() fix

From: Dhek Bhun Kho <bhun at chello dot nl>
To: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 16 Dec 2002 13:50:18 +0100
Subject: Re: BigInteger.modInverse() fix
References: <1039966534.16025.384.camel@elsschot><200212161954.10686.raif@fl.net.au> <3DFD9700.9010802@bothner.com> <200212162106.52496.raif@fl.net.au>

Hello,

> > > if the above is a question, then the answer is yes.  see lines
> > > #435, 436 (after patch is applied).
Uhm sorry to barge in, but has anyone actually proven that this code
works faster? 

Sorry if this is like an ignorant question.

humble greets, abhun.

References:
- BigInteger.modInverse() fix
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: BigInteger.modInverse() fix
  - From: Raif S. Naffah
- Re: BigInteger.modInverse() fix
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: BigInteger.modInverse() fix
  - From: Raif S. Naffah

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]