This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix err10.java test case failure on 64-bit hosts
- From: "Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Cc: java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 19:01:47 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix err10.java test case failure on 64-bit hosts
- Sensitivity:
Tom Tromey wrote:
>Where is UINT32 defined?
Well, the immediately following insn_lushr case uses UINT64, so I had
assumed those types were available ...
Looking closer, it would appear that both UINT64 and UINT32 are
actually defined not in libjava, but in the ffi.h header which
is included via java-interp.h.
>Will `unsigned jint' work? We know jint is 32 bits, and this lets us
>avoid portability problems with UINT32.
That should work as well, I guess. What about the UINT64, then?
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
Linux for S/390 Design & Development
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 --- Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com