This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcc CVS breakage
- From: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, tm <tm at mail dot kloo dot net>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:04:18 +0200
- Subject: Re: gcc CVS breakage
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0209101638130.2513-100000@mail.kloo.net><20020910173549.A7294@us.ibm.com><15742.56503.179926.24113@gargle.gargle.HOWL><20020911104816.A3089@us.ibm.com>
Janis Johnson writes:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 08:03:35AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > I reverted the patch to Makefile.am and Makefile.in to renable the
> > bootstrap.
> >
> > Both MAKEINFO and MAKEINFOFLAGS are overwritten by the toplevel
> > Makefile.
> >
> >
> > 2002-09-11 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
> >
> > * Makefile.am: Revert the previous patch.
> > * Makefile.in: Regenerated.
> >
> > --- Makefile.am~ 2002-09-11 07:17:56.000000000 +0200
> > +++ Makefile.am 2002-09-11 07:38:23.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -58,16 +58,6 @@
> >
> > AM_CFLAGS = @fastjar_warn_cflags@
> >
> > -MAKEINFO += -I $(srcdir)/../gcc/doc/include
> [snip]
>
> The MAKEINFO commands in gcc/Makefile specify the -I flags directly.
yes, but it's not autogenerated by automake, as fastjar does. The only
thing that would work is to duplicate the rules for dvi and info
generation, which is ugly as well.
or maybe do not pass MAKEINFOFLAGS from the toplevel makefile. It
seems it's not needed, because MAKEINFO is passed as "$(MAKEINFO)
$(MAKEINFOFLAGS)".
Matthias