This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: RFC: stack trace info for interpreter frames
- From: Anthony Green <green at redhat dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 31 Aug 2002 07:29:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: RFC: stack trace info for interpreter frames
- References: <87lm6qburq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 13:20, Tom Tromey wrote:
> * Is the technique of putting dummy functions before and after the
> interpreter function portable enough? It works ok for me on my
> Linux box, but that's hardly definitive. (If not this approach,
> then what?)
I don't think we should count on this when people may compile with
-ffunction-sections, giving the linker an easy opportunity to reorder
functions.
The approach I've take in my security model experiments is to register a
PC region when the method's closure is created. I'll try to finish my
patches this week.
AG