This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Updated throwable and stacktrace printing patch
Tom Tromey writes:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@cambridge.redhat.com> writes:
>
> Andrew> Some programmers may not be interested in gory details, but
> Andrew> others are. For us to presume that a heavily obfuscated stack
> Andrew> trace is an appropriate default is IMO unjustified.
>
> I don't have an opinion on the issue this directly refers to. But I
> did want to point out that in one case we definitely want to change
> the stack trace. That case is when there is an interpreted frame on
> the stack. In this case we should print information about what we're
> interpreting, not about the interpreter itself.
It's on my list. I have a way to do it, but I haven't yet got around to it.
Andrew.