This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Throwable stack trace printing again

From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:04:17 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Throwable stack trace printing again
References: <1027719277.1819.54.camel@elsschot><15685.30002.216505.831464@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><3D457F99.8030405@bothner.com>

Per Bothner writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > I think it's fair enough to store the raw stack trace as an unsigned
 > > long but you're using a jlong.  AFAIK conversion from signed longs to
 > > pointers is not well-defined, bvut in practice this will probably
 > > always be okay.  Clearly there's no Java type that corresponds to a
 > > native pointer.
 > 
 > We could perhaps use gnu.gcj.RawData.

Good idea.  I'd forgotten all about that.

Andrew.

References:
- Throwable stack trace printing again
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Throwable stack trace printing again
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Throwable stack trace printing again
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]