This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Patch: FYI: test suite fixlet
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 13 Jun 2002 11:48:31 -0600
- Subject: Patch: FYI: test suite fixlet
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
I'm checking this in.
This adds a `shouldfail' for the PR 6865 test.
Unfortunately we can't distinguish between a failure and a crash in
the test suite right now :-(. So this test isn't actually useful
without a test harness fix.
Tom
Index: ChangeLog
from Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* lib/libjava.exp (test_libjava): Fixed typo.
* libjava.compile/PR6865.xfail: New file.
Index: lib/libjava.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libjava/testsuite/lib/libjava.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -r1.41 libjava.exp
--- lib/libjava.exp 9 May 2002 21:01:55 -0000 1.41
+++ lib/libjava.exp 13 Jun 2002 17:33:50 -0000
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@
# `xfail-gcjC' compilation with gcj -C will fail
# `shouldfail' compilation from source is supposed to fail
# This is different from xfail, which marks a known
-# failure that we just havne't fixed.
+# failure that we just haven't fixed.
# A compilation marked this way should fail with any
# front end.
# `xfail-byte' compilation from bytecode will fail
Index: libjava.compile/PR6865.xfail
===================================================================
RCS file: libjava.compile/PR6865.xfail
diff -N libjava.compile/PR6865.xfail
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ libjava.compile/PR6865.xfail 13 Jun 2002 17:33:50 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+shouldfail