This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: PATCH: libjava FreeBSD configuration
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, rittle at labs dot mot dot com,<java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 16:48:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: PATCH: libjava FreeBSD configuration
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0204091607320.21072-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
|> On 8 Apr 2002, Tom Tromey wrote:
|> >> OK, with this patch and the related GC patch (just posted under
|> >> separate cover), I now see only this expected set of 4
|> >> deterministic failures (in both fully bootstrapped mainline and
|> >> 3.1 trees on i386-*-freebsd4.5):
|> > Thanks. I'm marking this port as `ok' on the status page.
|>
|> Perhaps I'm missing something, but... Why isn't libgcj enabled by default
|> on this platform (i386-unknown-freebsd4.5)
|>
|> That is, why does ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++,java just build the
|> java frontend, but not the libraries?
Because java libraries are not built by default unless explicitly
requested, either by using --enable-libgcj or by adding some patterns to
the toplevel configure.in file.
See also <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-04/msg00329.html>.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."