This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [XHTML 1.0] - java faq patches
- From: "Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci" <fwyzard at inwind dot it>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 19:09:33 +0100
- Subject: Re: [XHTML 1.0] - java faq patches
- References: <"Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci"'s message of "Wed, 13 Mar 2002 21:38:57 +0100"><5.1.0.14.0.20020313212611.00bd0008@popmail.inwind.it>
At 11:24 AM 3/14/02 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrea" == Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci <fwyzard@inwind.it> writes:
>
>Andrea> The file faq.html had to be heavuly rewritten, so I thought I
>Andrea> would post its diff before going on with the work, to receive
>Andrea> any comment on my choices. I've tried to make it appear as
>Andrea> close as possible to how it did before. The results are quite
>Andrea> good with IE 6, while using lynx (in some places) I liked it
>Andrea> best before. The problem is, using <h_> tags inside <dt> tags
>Andrea> is illegal in XHTML, while worked quite wll in HTML.
>
>I find it hard to visualize the effect these changes will have.
You can see my version at
<http://studenti.fisica.unifi.it/~fwyzard/gcc/java/faq.html>
>However, I trust your X?HTML capabilities (more than mine :-).
I'm not sure you should... this is my first effort at web pages :-)
>Why not just check it in if you think it is correct, and then send
>email when it is done.
'cause it took me hours just to rewrite this page, so even if I don't
expect to find others that needs rewriting this bad, I would like if this
is OK before going on.
>We can always update the pages again if there
>is some change we'd like to make.
Ok, I'll go on anyway, then.
>Thanks,
>Tom
fwyzard