Re: WIN-25.1: natPlainSocketImpl.cc [UPDATED]

[Adam Megacz <patches at lists dot megacz dot com>]

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Megacz <patches@lists.megacz.com> writes:
> 
> >> Ah, thanks. The problem is that implicit void* -> char* conversion is 
> >> not allowed, however char* -> void*  should be perfectly fine.
> 
> Adam> So what's the final status on this? What do I need to do in order to
> Adam> get my patch committed?
> 
> I think first Bryce should check in his recv patch.
> 
> About your patch:
> 
> * You need a newline before the definitions of write and read.
> * Shouldn't write and read be static?

Yes, you're right.

Bryce, could you let me know when you check in the recv patch?

  - a

-- 
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
 claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
 Mechanism'."                                     --lynx_user_abroad

Why Windows NT/2k/XP is unreliable: www.zappadoodle.com