This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:42:45 -0800
Subject: Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
References: <20020221124457.B19445@redhat.com> <orheoa5xdf.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221141806.A19560@redhat.com> <or8z9m5tzf.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20020221153343.A19615@redhat.com> <or4rka430j.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <200202220334.WAA22924@makai.watson.ibm.com> <orn0y22mge.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <aoliva@redhat.com> <200202220429.XAA26890@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:29:46PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> 	* gcc.c (init_gcc_specs): Do not link with static libgcc.a if
> 	gcc invoked with -shared-libgcc.

I think this was done the way it was due to issues similar to
what came up with pa-linux recently.  So installing this may
break something, but I can't remember what.

I guess we have no real choice but to unbreak AIX by installing
this then address the fallout on a case-by-case basis.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: libstdc++ libtool lossage
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]