Re: WIN-20: same thing for java/net

[Adam Megacz <patches at lists dot megacz dot com>]

Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
> Are we sure that we want to have completely different implementations 
> here for Win32 and Posix? ie Winsock is different enough from Posix that 
> sharing parts of the implementation is not possible?

Hrm, on further inspection, with some ugly casting and a pile of
#defines, I think I can make it happen. Error handling and <clinit>
stuff is the only part that's substantially different.

Sorry I didn't notice this before; I inherited the java.net stuff in a
mostly-working state.

I'll make a patch against the existing java/net/nat*.cc bits.

  - a

-- 
"In the dream, someone was asking me 'So what you're saying is that
 all your dreams are lucid?' 'Yes,' I replied 'except for this one.'"
                                                         -- epepke@k5