This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Java: Fix for PR 4695

To: Eric Blake <ebb9 at email dot byu dot edu>
Subject: Re: Java: Fix for PR 4695
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 15:38:06 +1300
CC: apbianco at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <3BE2489C.3050901@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <opk7x41zid.fsf@fencer.cygnus.com> <3BE7550D.7060002@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <15336.24117.846895.562925@fencer.cygnus.com> <3BE88C21.4010607@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <3BE891AE.14D3CF43@email.byu.edu>

Eric Blake wrote:

>This observation is correct, even though jikes 1.15 does not implement
>it correctly!  Note that there is a difference between a true static
>class (ACC_STATIC bit set) and a local or anonymous class in a static
>context.
>

Do you happen to know if this is actually dictated by the spec, or if it 
is just nice to have in order to be exactly the same as javac?

regards

Bryce.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java: Fix for PR 4695
  - From: Eric Blake

References:
- Java: Fix for PR 4695
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java: Fix for PR 4695
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco
- Re: Java: Fix for PR 4695
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Java: Fix for PR 4695
  - From: Eric Blake

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]