This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: The old _Jv_InitClass problem is still present in 3.1 (patch included)
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Subject: Re: The old _Jv_InitClass problem is still present in 3.1 (patch included)
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 28 Sep 2001 09:13:44 -0600
- Cc: martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <20010927153258.A16126@keksy.muc.infineon.com> <3BB3B06F.60006@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
Bryce> I looked at this some more. Could you try this patch instead? I
Bryce> don't think its correct to initialize "target" just because its
Bryce> the subject of an instanceof or checkcast.
I agree. I looked in the JLS and I think both these are considered
passive uses, which don't cause class initialization.
Tom