This is the mail archive of the java-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch: LocaleInformation

To: <tromey at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: Patch: LocaleInformation
From: "Anthony Green" <green at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:06:19 -0700
Cc: <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <200109170708.AAA01560@fencer.cygnus.com> <87heu1ak8v.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <026f01c13f90$5385c240$5be6b4cd@cygnus.com> <873d5lajlo.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

Tom wrote:
> I don't see how the patch in question can work though, because the
> en_US -> en chaining won't work when the base class is used (because
> chaining works based on the name and not inheritance).  So references
> to certain properties will still fail.  Maybe it just happens to work
> in the particular case you care about?

Well - it definitely does make Tomcat go.  Tomcat was calling the
DateFormatSymbols constructor, which was failing in ResourceBundle.getObject.
Hmmm... didn't the old implementation have some wrapper to protect us from
these MissingKey exceptions?  Maybe we just need those back.

AG

References:
- Patch: LocalInformation
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: Patch: LocalInformation
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Patch: LocaleInformation
  - From: Anthony Green
- Re: Patch: LocaleInformation
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]