Re: Patch: LocaleInformation

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Green <green@redhat.com> writes:

Anthony> I'll try to look into this soon.  For now, however, is it
Anthony> really any worse than having it extend LocaleInformation_en?
Anthony> It's just as arbitrary, no?

Probably I should back out the en/en_US change I introduced.
Or just push the en_US defaults into the base class itself.

I don't see how the patch in question can work though, because the
en_US -> en chaining won't work when the base class is used (because
chaining works based on the name and not inheritance).  So references
to certain properties will still fail.  Maybe it just happens to work
in the particular case you care about?

Tom