Re: About java.security and AWT patches

[Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>]

Tom Tromey writes:

> Mark has already said that the last major development needed is
> Richard's EH merge; I think I'd rather we start looking at compiler
> regressions and critical bugs in the core packages, and leave
> everything else for 3.1.

That would make sense. As far as compiler regressions are concerned,
I'm willing do what's necessary to stick by the results we briefly
attained a few weeks ago (0 unexpected failure,) where applicable.

I remember we talked about packages that we'd like to see build and
run properly with 3.0 on a selected set of platforms. Should we try to
make this a goal too? Or is it too much for the amount of work we can
commit too?

./A