Re: `make install` should install the info files in java

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <per@bothner.com> writes:

Per> The next question is: is Bryan Burns ok with the idea that when a
Per> distribution (OS) vendor wants to make a "fastjar" package that
Per> they use the version that comes with gcc, rather than the version
Per> at sourceforge?  Another way of thinking of it: would it be ok to
Per> treat the gcc cvs version as the master ("upstream") version?
Per> Would Bryan consider making the gcc version the master version,
Per> or at least agree to make sure they are in sync?  (We'd give in
Per> check-in priviliges, of course.)  If the answer to these
Per> questions is "yes", then I think fastjar should stay in the gcc
Per> tree, otherwise it should probably go.

If he's willing to do that then it would be fine.  Could you ask him?
Make sure he knows what he's getting into though.  For instance he'll
lose a lot of control over the program, as people with global write
privileges are free to ok random changes to it.  In fact, this has
already happened to the fastjar in our tree.

Tom