This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: `make install` should install the info files in java
- To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
- Subject: Re: `make install` should install the info files in java
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 18:55:53 +0100 (BST)
- cc: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On 4 Apr 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> > I definitely don't like the idea of
> > installing gij as java or "gcj -C" as javac.
>
> Well, I think that should be an option (by which I mean we should
> make gij as compatible as possible with java amd "gcj -C' as compatible
> as possible with javac, so someone *can* install things that way).
> I think it would be premature at best for our Makefiles to to
> actually install gij/gcj as java/javac, though it could be a configure
> option.
See also my proposal (on the projects page) for an option
--enable-cc-links to install gcc under names cc, c89, c99 (for systems
where GCC provides the native C compiler). Though we ought to design a
sensible configure option scheme - so that rather than --enable-cpp
--enable-cc-links --enable-javac or some such irregular collection of
options, we have --enable-install-names=cc,c89,c99,cpp,javac,java,jar or
similar to control which "generic" names (that might conflict with other
system programs) are installed.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk