This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: `make install` should install the info files in java
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Subject: Re: `make install` should install the info files in java
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 03 Apr 2001 11:49:57 -0600
- Cc: apbianco at cygnus dot com, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0103261435120.30699-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <hor8zklkag.fsf@gee.suse.de> <15039.34419.609412.95021@deliverance.cygnus.com> <87ae623cvk.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3AC7C508.F37AB3CC@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
>> Right now we install fastjar. However, I don't think we should.
>> We really should only use it when building.
Bryce> Why not? The JDK provides a jar utility, I don't see a reason
Bryce> why we shouldn't, except that it might be nicer to have out own
Bryce> "jar" written in Java which excercises the java.util.jar
Bryce> implementation in libgcj.
My only reason is that I don't want to fix bugs in it, or document, or
do any of the other things we'd have to do if we supported it.
Tom