This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: ia64 eh, part 20a [java]
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 04:40:23PM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> Well, that's what I'm worrying about - it looks like you might have.
> But I assume you've run the testsuite?
I have, but I unfortunately at the time I was doing this there
were quite a lot of bytecode failures anyway. I noticed that
you've fixed a lot of them recently; I should go back and examine
some of the remaining and see if they're exception related.
> Well, it's a opinion that I would prefer to minimize places where
> we generate different tree nodes depending on -femit-class-files,
> so it would be nice to keep this in mind when evaluating different
> implementations.
Ideally we could use a java-specific tree node, use that directly
for the bytecode, and expand that to the generic tree codes when
compiling to native. Don't know if that's feasable at the moment.
r~