This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: libjava -vs- shared libgcc
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: Patch: libjava -vs- shared libgcc
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: 22 Mar 2001 11:05:26 -0700
- Cc: Java Patch List <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <87y9tz2c01.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <3AB94786.C1ABF9BC@albatross.co.nz>
- Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com
>> + -rpath $(toolexeclibdir) -shared-libgcc
Bryce> Are you sure that is the right thing to do? Won't it break
Bryce> libjava on platforms that really dont use a shared libgcc?
Bryce> Isn't this a generic problem that needs to be fixed in the
Bryce> PowerPC compiler somewhere?
Maybe it needs to be fixed in the compiler. I don't know. As far as
I can tell the compiler is working how it was planned to work.
I agree with your assessment though. I'll change it so that
-shared-libgcc will only be used when --enable-shared is in effect.
I didn't even consider static-only hosts when I wrote this :-(
Tom