This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Eliminating Assembler Already Defined Messages for Java Library
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: Eliminating Assembler Already Defined Messages for Java Library
- From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:24:36 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, oldham at codesourcery dot com, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <10103122246.AA20045@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu><m21ys2xzfg.fsf@kelso.bothner.com><20010312190326N.mitchell@codesourcery.com><m2ofv5w8ad.fsf@kelso.bothner.com><3AAEBF64.EA1A9284@albatross.co.nz>
- Reply-To: apbianco at cygnus dot com
[java-patch is actually java-patches.]
Bryce McKinlay writes:
> We should probibly get rid of the checks on the branch as well -
> accepts-illegal is better than rejects-legal IMHO.
I was going look at it but if you want to get rid of the code, what
can I say, go ahead. I'd like to see someone write something based on
Per's check-init.c code -- I tried to reuse it but couldn't figure how
to make it work in this particular context at the time I decided to
spend some time on a solution.
Now I don't have that much time to spend on this issue.
./A