This is the mail archive of the java-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: 23 Jan 2001 12:17:45 -0700
Cc: bryce at albatross dot co dot nz, stewart at lab43 dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101221713060.22134-100000@dystopia.lab43.org> <20010123012719F.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <3A6D641D.1C3CCCCB@albatross.co.nz> <20010123095403Y.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

Mark> The good news is that because it has taken so long to branch,
Mark> and because you and other GCJ folks stepped up to deal with the
Mark> ABI issues, I'm pretty sure there *is* going to be Java support
Mark> in GCC 3.0, which is terrific!

"pretty sure" implies that there is some doubt.  What is this doubt
conditional upon?  Is there something we can do to change it from
probable to definite?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
  - From: Rod Stewart
- Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Enable libgcj for Linux targets
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]