This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: PATCH: libgcj -vs- libstdc++-v3
- To: tromey at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: PATCH: libgcj -vs- libstdc++-v3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 13 Oct 2000 17:15:28 -0200
- Cc: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, java-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, Olivier Louchart-Fletcher <olivier dot louchart at netregistry dot au dot com>
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <39E66555.47286ED@albatross.co.nz><87n1g9cqqm.fsf@creche.cygnus.com>
On Oct 13, 2000, Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> wrote:
> Will v3 be the default in gcc 3.0?
Yep. And the default is going to change in the very near future, I
heard.
> Will package builders put libsupc++ into the -dev packages or into the
> ordinary runtime packages? That might be a disadvantage.
Interesting question...
> I think we should follow what C++ does and link it into our library.
> That seems safest.
But, IIRC, you may need part of the GCC sources to be able to build
libsupc++. Or do you mean just linking libgcj with libsupc++ so that
it gets all the needed symbols?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me