This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: AWTException
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
- Subject: Re: Patch: AWTException
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 16:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: tromey at cygnus dot com, java-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <874s9hmycb.fsf@cygnus.com><38EA6728.C73B507C@albatross.co.nz>
Bryce> Is there a way we can speed up "make install"?
I sometimes run "make install-exec" to avoid installing the headers.
Or we could replace the install-data-local rule with something faster.
>> Maybe as a "java-awt.so" library?
Bryce> Personally I think "libgcjawt.so" sounds better, but I guess
Bryce> "java-awt.so" would mean that class.forName() can work on
Bryce> it.
On second thought I imagine nobody will load AWT that way.
Bryce> What we should consider is ultimatly having a extendable
Bryce> mechanism where the compiler can automatically link with the
Bryce> right libraries. Typing "-ljava-awt" won't be too much of a
Bryce> problem for now, but it would be cool if the compiler could
Bryce> automagically link the right libraries based on what your code
Bryce> is using.
Any suggestions for how we could implement this?
I guess we could just hack the linker somehow.
Historically we haven't put much effort into linker hacking for Java.
Tom