This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: assuming signed overflow does not occur
On 09/04/17 08:54, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> I wrote an explanation of the current status of Wstrict-overflow to the
> best of my knowledge:
> I didn't mention GIMPLE because it is often the case that the root of
> the problem is not obvious in gimple unless one also debugs the compiler
> at the same time.
> I hope it is useful!
Very much so, thank you!