This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Overwhelmed by GCC frustration


On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 19:04 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> 
> LRA is easier to work with than old reload, and that makes it better
> maintainable.
> 
> Making LRA handle everything reload did is work, and someone needs to
> do it.
> 
> LRA probably needs a few more target hooks (a _few_) to guide its
> decisions.

Like Georg-Johann mentioned before, LRA has been targeted mainly for
mainstream ISAs.  And actually it's a pretty reasonable choice.  Again,
I don't think that "one RA to rule them all" is a scalable approach.
 But that's just my opinion.

Cheers,
Oleg


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]