This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Overwhelmed by GCC frustration

On 04/08/17 10:38, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
> Maybe better is to use the updated CsIbe repo from github
> I use it for ARC to track the code
> size.

Thanks for the link Claudiu.  Personally I'll probably stick with the
existing code as I now have size data for it stretching back about 10
years, but I'll have a look to see if it might be worth running both.


> Cheers,
> Claudiu
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Richard Earnshaw
> <> wrote:
>> On 03/08/17 13:11, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>> Long ago, there was a code size regression tester for at least
>>>> ARM. Is that still around?
>>> There used to be autotesters from CSiBE. Something still appears to
>>> exist ( but the last time I tried to run the
>>> benchmark, I couldn't get the suite to compile. That was some years
>>> ago, perhaps the situation is better nowadays (
>>> without the old, suggests something's changed at some point...).
>>> As for "long ago", see also your own reply to
>>> :-)
>>> Ciao!
>>> Steven
>> CSiBE does still build (but you need -sdt=gnu98).  I build it nightly.
>> R.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]