This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Linux and Windows generate different binaries
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Klaus Kruse Pedersen (Klaus)
> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 08:57 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> On 07/12/2017 05:07 AM, Klaus Kruse Pedersen (Klaus) wrote:
>> > I have seen reproducible builds being discussed here, but what is
>> > the
>> > position on inter c-lib and OS reproducible builds?
>> I think we consider unstable sort problems bugs and have fixed them
>> the past. Bugzilla search turned up #28964 and I remember at least
>> more recent instance of this as well (although not the details any
> Yes, 28964 is similar to the issue I was hit by.
> By extension, does that mean that all qsort compare/rank functions that
> can return 0, should be considered buggy?
> I went through a some of the 140'ish rank functions - and it does
> indeed look like considerable effort went into returning only +1 and
> A general pattern seem to be:
> return da ? 1 : -1;
> And comments like:
> /* If regs are equally good, sort by their numbers, so that the
> results of qsort leave nothing to chance. */
> But there are exceptions, all rank functions in
> can return 0.
One more issue with some of qsort callbacks is that they do not always
satisfy ordering axioms which in practice may result in random
variations in output. I once reported this in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02141.html but didn't