This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi love and care


On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 01:59:28 PDT (-0700), gerald@pfeifer.com wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> I looked at our stuff (RISC-V) and there's almost nothing in there.
>> Is there something I should add?  I looked at the aarch64 stuff in the
>> "host/target specific issues start here" section and there's some notes
>> about binutils-2.24. We'll require binutils-2.28 (the first version that
>> we're upstream in), I can add a note in that section about RISC-V as
>> well if you think it's appropriate.
>
> I am generally a fan of keeping documentation short (lest it is
> skipped or skimmed), but as long as necessary.
>
> In your case I don't think artificially blowing up the section on RISC-V
> to match others would be helpful.  However, given that binutils 2.28 is
> so brand new, that I'd definitely mention.
>
> (My proposals/patches yesterday are about removing references to ten
> year old versions of binutils from install.texi, quite the other end
> of the spectrum.)

Makes sense.  I think I found a few other problems in ours as well.  How does
this look?

[PATCH] RISC-V documentation cleanups


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]