This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
diagnostics: %<%s%> vs. %qs
- From: Roland Illig <roland dot illig at gmx dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 21:38:06 +0100
- Subject: diagnostics: %<%s%> vs. %qs
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
in the diagnostics the %qs specifier is used in most of the cases. But
there are some cases left where the more complicated %<%s%> is used. Is
there a good reason to prefer the complicated spelling?
Same for %<%T%> and %qT, and similar letters.