This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Obsolete powerpc*-*-*spe*

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:10 AM, David Edelsohn <> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Sandra Loosemore
> <> wrote:
>> On 02/16/2017 03:19 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 02:49:47PM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>>>> I propose to mark powerpc*-*-*spe* as obsolete in GCC 7.  This includes
>>>>> the spe.h installed header file, all the __builtin_spe* intrinsics, the
>>>>> -mfloat-gprs= command-line option, and the support for the SPE ABIs.
>>>>> No one has properly tested these targets in a long time (the latest
>>>>> testresults I could find are from July 2015, >1000 failures), and the
>>>>> SPE support makes a lot of code much more complex.
>>>>> Any objections to this obsoletion?  GCC 7 will then be the last release
>>>>> with support for SPE (it will need --enable-obsolete to build these
>>>>> targets), and we will delete the SPE support during GCC 8 development.
>>>> Can I ask that we hold off a bit before making a decision on this?
>>> Of course, that is what we're doing in any case.
>>> Note that obsoleting it in GCC 7 means GCC 7 will still work, and that
>>> we *can* remove it in GCC 8; we do not have to.  You have plenty of time
>>> to find some way to keep SPE support in GCC.  The obsoletion notice _is_
>>> the advance warning you're asking for.
>>> The gcc-7/changes.html text I'll propose later says:
>>>    <li><p>Support for a number of older systems and recently
>>>    unmaintained or untested target ports of GCC has been declared
>>>    obsolete in GCC 7.  Unless there is activity to revive them, the
>>>    next release of GCC will have their sources permanently
>>>    <strong>removed</strong>.</p>
>>>    <p>The following ports for individual systems on
>>>    particular architectures have been obsoleted:</p>
>>>    <ul>
>>>      <li>PowerPC SPE (powerpc*-*-*spe*) as announced
>>>      <a href="";>
>>>          here</a>.</li>
>>>    </ul>
>>>    </li>
>> I understand that you're not going to remove the SPE support tomorrow. But
>> that notice is going to scare users who depend on it, and I think it's not a
>> good idea to scare users unnecessarily.  AFAIK GCC 7 is not going to be
>> released tomorrow, either, so why not give folks a little more time to look
>> into alternatives to announcing the support is being obsoleted?  IMO that
>> should only be done when new maintainers have been solicited and nobody has
>> come forward.
> Sandra,
> This is not a new issue.  The maintainer did not suddenly resign last
> week.  There have been numerous efforts to reach out to the SPE
> community for over a *decade*, cajoling them to step up with
> maintenance for the port.  I am glad that this notice of obsolescence
> has focused more attention on the long-standing problem.


I'd like us to be more agressive in deprecating/removing of unmaintained
parts of GCC.  It's not only target/host support but also things like
language extensions (or frontends) as well as optimization passes.


> Thanks, David

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]