This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Obsolete powerpc*-*-*spe*
On 14/02/17 15:09, David Brown wrote:
On 14/02/17 12:55, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 14/02/17 04:07, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
I propose to mark powerpc*-*-*spe* as obsolete in GCC 7. This includes
the spe.h installed header file, all the __builtin_spe* intrinsics, the
-mfloat-gprs= command-line option, and the support for the SPE ABIs.
No one has properly tested these targets in a long time (the latest
testresults I could find are from July 2015, >1000 failures), and the
SPE support makes a lot of code much more complex.
Any objections to this obsoletion? GCC 7 will then be the last release
with support for SPE (it will need --enable-obsolete to build these
targets), and we will delete the SPE support during GCC 8 development.
the SPE unit is still used in the embedded PowerPC processors from
Freescale/NXP/Qualcomm, for example QorIQ P1020. These products are not
obsolete or even not recommended for new designs. These chips have a
long product life-cycle.
It is also used in many PPC based microcontrollers, which are used in
the automotive industry and other places where you need highly reliable
and robust but powerful microcontrollers. However, gcc support for
these has traditionally been poor - there is little support for the
variety of cores and configurations available from Freescale/NXP. I
believe there is a chicken-and-egg situation here - few people use gcc
with these devices because there is poorer device support compared to
Freescale CodeWarrior or Green Hills, and there is little incentive for
gcc developers (such as the CodeSourcery or IBM PPC folks) to support
devices in gcc if no one uses that combination.
Yes, we use GCC also one these chips, however, due to the lack of VLE
support the situation is even worse. Looks like support for the non-IBM
PowerPC is dead in GCC. I can understand this pretty well.
With the Qualcomm takeover of Freescale/NXP I guess the PowerPC has no
future in this area and they will move to ARM for the processor cores.
Its a pity that Freescale/NXP/Qualcomm stopped to support GCC
development and IBM is burdened to take care of this. I can understand
your reasoning, however, its not true that there are no users of the SPE
I think what would be needed would be for Freescale/NXP/Qualcomm to put
some money and effort in here, with the aim of making gcc their standard
compiler for these targets (as they have done for ARM, replacing the old
Failing that, it is of course better to have no SPE support than broken
SPE support, especially if it makes development harder for other devices.
Yes, in case Qualcomm shows no interest to support their PowerPC stuff
in GCC its quite understandable to remove the support for it eventually.
IBM already did a great job in keeping it up and running for a long time.
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : firstname.lastname@example.org
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.