This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Doc question: is "templatized" a word?
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:48:13 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Doc question: is "templatized" a word?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <589E8ED2.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> The documentation for -Wno-non-template-friend refers to "non-templatized
> friend functions" and "templatized functions". I don't see the term
> "templatized" used anywhere in the C++ standard. This paragraph also uses
> "nontemplate function", which I assume refers to the same thing the C++
> standard spells "non-template function". So does "non-templatized function"
> also mean "non-template function"? Or does it have some other meaning?
I would avoid "templatized" and believe "non-template function" is
more appropriate in your example.