This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/11/2017 12:25 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Thank your help! (testsuite/target-supports.exp is quite a library!) So this test is 64-bit only and makes heavy use of gcc extensions (mostly attributes ms_abi). It's aim is to test pro & epilogue creation for 64-bit ms_abi functions that call sysv_abi functions (these are the ones that result in the massive SSE clobbers). I do not believe msvc supports sysv_abi functions, so the test the test can't be built there. As such, I'm only intending to run this when gcc is being tested on 64-bit x86 platforms. The resulting program must be executed on the target as well, so I was using [isnative]. Would this then be the correct test?A test [istarget x86_64-*-gnu] is wrong; i?86-* -m64 should always be handled exactly the same as x86_64-* -m64. You need to work out which ABIs (-m32, -mx32, -m64) this testing is meaningful for. Then, allow both x86_64- and i?86- targets, together with an appropriate effective-target test ("lp64" to allow just -m64, for example).
if { (![istarget x86_64-*] && ![istarget i?86-*]) || ![is-effective-target lp64] || ![isnative] } then { unsupported "$subdir" return } Thanks, Daniel
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |