This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: un-optimal code because of forwprop after gcc-5?

From: Pitchumani Sivanupandi <pitchumani dot sivanupandi at microchip dot com>
To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:27:25 +0530
Subject: Re: un-optimal code because of forwprop after gcc-5?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <49107d29-f5e9-e753-5104-7565f537881e@microchip.com> <4ba7cc10-ca8c-4dda-b8a6-7db7b2a2d6a7@redhat.com>

On Friday 06 January 2017 09:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:

On 01/06/2017 03:09 AM, Pitchumani Sivanupandi wrote:

Found a code size regression for AVR target in gcc-5 and higher. Looks
like it
is applicable to x86_64 also.

Please file a bug.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla


Filed. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79028

Regards,
Pitchumani

References:
- un-optimal code because of forwprop after gcc-5?
  - From: Pitchumani Sivanupandi
- Re: un-optimal code because of forwprop after gcc-5?
  - From: Jeff Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]