This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 01/06/2017 03:26 AM, Aurelien Buhrig wrote:
I would suggesting moving away from cc0 first. cc0 is an abomination and should have been abolished years ago -- the only reason is many old ports would break and nobody's taken the time to convert them or propose them for deprecation.Look at the dump file for reload to see where things come from. Also everything Jeff said; you really want LRA.I will try switching to LRA in a second step, but I think I need first to remove the old cc0... BTW, in which way the LRA is better than IRA? Is there any benchmarks?
While we try to keep the cc0-target paths working, they're not exercised all that much and can easily break.
jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |