This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why are GCC Internals not Specification Driven ?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Seima Rao <seimarao at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:37:03 +0000
- Subject: Re: Why are GCC Internals not Specification Driven ?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAESP5aq7R=zxozDPTSJMnKWLF_TkyVCu6UssKPz97SoOXyz4Cg@mail.gmail.com>
On 18/12/16 02:33, Seima Rao wrote:
> Precisely, stuffs like GENERIC, GIMPLE, RTL, gas(inline assembly),
> GCC extensions internals, ... and gnu's own debugging tied to gcc
> (if such exist nowadays), ... are not documented in a specification
> driven way.
That's interesting. Can you explain what you mean by a specification-