This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Do we really need a CPP manual?
- From: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
- To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:15:02 +0200
- Subject: Re: Do we really need a CPP manual?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <58538DBB.email@example.com>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Sandra Loosemore
> On a related topic.... do we really need to retain implementations of
> -traditional-cpp and the documented "obsolete features" (assertions)? It
> seems especially weird to retain support for -traditional-cpp given that
> support for pre-ANSI C was removed from the compiler proper at least a dozen
> years ago.
IIRC the Fortran frontend use CPP in traditional mode.