This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing (was: basic_block flags, BB_VISITED)


On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge
<thomas@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:06:59 +0200, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
>> > On 10/14/16 05:28, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> >> The BB_VISITED flag has indetermined state at the beginning of a pass.
>> >> You have to ensure it is cleared yourself.
>> >
>> >
>> > In that case the openacc (&nvptx?) passes should be modified to clear the
>> > flags at their start, rather than at their end.
>
> The gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c handling seems fine -- it explicitly clears
> BB_VISITED for all basic block it works on.
>
>> Yes.  But as I said, I ran into IRA ICEs (somewhere in the testsuite) when not
>> cleaning up after tree-ssa-propagate.c.  So somebody has to fix IRA first.
>
> Is there a GCC PR for that, or where are you tracking such issues?

No, just tracking in my head.

> OK to commit the following?  Is such a test case appropriate (which would
> have caught this issue right away), in particular the dg-final
> scan-tree-dump line?

Ugh.  Not worse to what we do in various dwarf scanning I guess.

Doesn't failure lead to a miscompile eventually?  So you could formulate
this as a dg-do run test with a check for the desired outcome?

Richard.

> commit 4e8abdfd25aa08abbad0c3fe2e9ec6182308f78c
> Author: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> Date:   Mon Oct 17 11:29:43 2016 +0200
>
>     Clear basic block flags before using BB_VISITED for OpenACC loops processing
>
>         gcc/
>         * omp-low.c (oacc_loop_discovery): Call clear_bb_flags.
>
>         gcc/testsuite/
>         * gcc.dg/goacc/loop-processing-1.c: New file.
> ---
>  gcc/omp-low.c                                  |  9 +++++----
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/goacc/loop-processing-1.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git gcc/omp-low.c gcc/omp-low.c
> index 213bf8c..5257d21 100644
> --- gcc/omp-low.c
> +++ gcc/omp-low.c
> @@ -19340,7 +19340,9 @@ oacc_loop_sibling_nreverse (oacc_loop *loop)
>  static oacc_loop *
>  oacc_loop_discovery ()
>  {
> -  basic_block bb;
> +  /* Clear basic block flags, in particular BB_VISITED which we're going to use
> +     in the following.  */
> +  clear_bb_flags ();
>
>    oacc_loop *top = new_oacc_loop_outer (current_function_decl);
>    oacc_loop_discover_walk (top, ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
> @@ -19349,9 +19351,8 @@ oacc_loop_discovery ()
>       that diagnostics come out in an unsurprising order.  */
>    top = oacc_loop_sibling_nreverse (top);
>
> -  /* Reset the visited flags.  */
> -  FOR_ALL_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
> -    bb->flags &= ~BB_VISITED;
> +  /* Clear basic block flags again, as otherwise IRA will explode later on.  */
> +  clear_bb_flags ();
>
>    return top;
>  }
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/goacc/loop-processing-1.c gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/goacc/loop-processing-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2f0b3a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/goacc/loop-processing-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* Make sure that OpenACC loop processing happens.  */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-oaccdevlow" } */
> +
> +extern int place ();
> +
> +int vector_1 (int *ary, int size)
> +{
> +#pragma acc parallel num_workers (32) vector_length(32) copy(ary[0:size]) firstprivate (size)
> +  {
> +#pragma acc loop gang
> +    for (int jx = 0; jx < 1; jx++)
> +#pragma acc loop auto
> +      for (int ix = 0; ix < size; ix++)
> +       ary[ix] = place ();
> +  }
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "OpenACC loops.*Loop 0\\\(0\\\).*Loop 14\\\(1\\\).*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_HEAD_MARK, 0, 1, 20\\\);.*Head-0:.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_HEAD_MARK, 0, 1, 20\\\);.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_FORK, \\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+, 0\\\);.*Tail-0:.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_TAIL_MARK, \\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+, 1\\\);.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_JOIN, \\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+, 0\\\);.*Loop 6\\\(4\\\).*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_HEAD_MARK, 0, 1, 6\\\);.*Head-0:.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_HEAD_MARK, 0, 1, 6\\\);.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_FORK, \\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+, 2\\\);.*Tail-0:.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_TAIL_MARK, \\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+, 1\\\);.*\\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+ = UNIQUE \\\(OACC_JOIN, \\\.data_dep\\\.\[0-9_\]+, 2\\\);" "oaccdevlow" } } */
>
>
> Grüße
>  Thomas


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]