This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Additional BOFs for the GNU Cauldron?


There seems to be plenty of slots available on the 2nd track to
schedule additional BOFs.  So I'd gather if there is interest
in discussing

 A) Unit testing (GIMPLE FE, RTL FE, the existing unit-testing),
    basically how people feel about moving forward here and how
    this would affect the current testsuite structure

 B) GIMPLE evolution.  With LTO early debug we could finally remove
    some tree slack at some point in the compilation.  There is
    also increasing need to somehow represent multiple outputs
    from a GIMPLE stmt (we've used complex types as a workaround
    in some cases) -- esp. if we would consider moving GIMPLE further
    into the backend area by lowering it and for example performing
    instruction selection on GIMPLE (we'd need to represent flag
    registers, etc.)

 C) Vectorizer.  There's no vectorizer specific talk yet, the usual
    suspects would be an update from the we-rewrite-the-vectorizer
    folks and ideas about how to improve cost modeling.

If there's no strong interest in any of the above we can schedule
stuf as needed at the Cauldron itself as well.

Thanks,
Richard.

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]