This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test
- From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, gcc Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Edelsohn <edelsohn at gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:59:24 +0100
- Subject: Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CAESRpQDJqTz99XG88tujt_9N8D2Q38uE08EX86QJ2tP_0XJydg@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 August 2016 at 21:34, Manuel López-Ibáñez <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 4 August 2016 at 21:27, DJ Delorie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Manuel Lpez-Ibñez <email@example.com> writes:
>>> none? for libiberty, no regular maintainer for build machinery,
>> Perhaps this is a sign that I should step down as maintainers for those?
> I don't see how that helps. Neither my message nor Thomas's is a
> criticism of people. The question is how to get more people to help
> and how to improve the situation. For sure, everybody is doing the
> best that they can with the time that they have.
Another question is how to help existing maintainers such that they
are more motivated to review patches. Is it a lack of time? lack of
Interest in the project? do patches simply fall through the cracks? is
it a dead-lock of people waiting for each other to comment?
There were some comments by Richard and Eric here:
but they do not seem to apply in this case.