gcc archive
date index for August, 2016

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 23, 2016
20:20 Re: Release notes for GCC 7? Gerald Pfeifer
16:13 Release notes for GCC 7? Joseph Myers
11:05 Re: Weird behaviour with --target_board="unix{var1,var2}" Pedro Alves
09:55 Re: Weird behaviour with --target_board="unix{var1,var2}" Jonathan Wakely
09:07 Sandra Retin-A Price: 11.00 RXD Pharmacy
08:07 Re: Weird behaviour with --target_board="unix{var1,var2}" Jonathan Wakely

August 22, 2016
20:16 Re: Weird behaviour with --target_board="unix{var1,var2}" Pedro Alves
17:06 GCC 6.2 Released Richard Biener
15:23 Re: How do you emit RTL for a jump to a mem/symbol instead of an asm label? Daniel Santos
14:40 Weird behaviour with --target_board="unix{var1,var2}" Jonathan Wakely
11:36 question about optab_libfunc() returning bogus libfuncs for sdivmod_optab Prathamesh Kulkarni
10:47 GCC 6.3 Status Report (2016-08-22) Richard Biener

August 21, 2016
23:00 Re: How do you emit RTL for a jump to a mem/symbol instead of an asm label? Segher Boessenkool
22:36 gcc-7-20160821 is now available gccadmin
19:01 Re: How do you emit RTL for a jump to a mem/symbol instead of an asm label? Daniel Santos

August 20, 2016
14:53 Re: How do you emit RTL for a jump to a mem/symbol instead of an asm label? Jeff Law
11:58 How do you emit RTL for a jump to a mem/symbol instead of an asm label? Daniel Santos

August 19, 2016
19:55 Replacement for the .stabs directive Umesh Kalappa
09:26 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Richard Biener
09:22 Re: Name of libgcc.so.1 with suffix? Richard Biener
08:21 Re: fxsrintrin.h Segher Boessenkool
08:00 Re: fxsrintrin.h Jonathan Wakely
08:00 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Prasad Ghangal
06:45 Re: fxsrintrin.h Jakub Jelinek
06:29 Re: fxsrintrin.h David Wohlferd
05:51 Re: fxsrintrin.h lhmouse
03:52 fxsrintrin.h David Wohlferd

August 18, 2016
22:37 gcc-6-20160818 is now available gccadmin
15:57 Re: Name of libgcc.so.1 with suffix? Steven G. Kargl
13:04 Re: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? David Brown
08:25 Re: Name of libgcc.so.1 with suffix? Jonathan Wakely
07:59 Re: Name of libgcc.so.1 with suffix? Richard Biener

August 17, 2016
23:04 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Daniel Santos
22:56 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Daniel Santos
22:06 Re: Supporting subreg style patterns Jim Wilson
21:11 Name of libgcc.so.1 with suffix? Steve Kargl
14:27 Re: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? lhmouse
14:15 Re: Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? David Brown
08:38 Re: Using LTO-enabled libgfortran Richard Biener
06:36 Re: Using LTO-enabled libgfortran Thomas Koenig
00:25 Possible missed optimization opportunity with const? Toshi Morita

August 16, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160816 is now available gccadmin
18:58 Re: Using LTO-enabled libgfortran Richard Biener
17:11 Using LTO-enabled libgfortran Thomas Koenig
16:43 Re: option -mprfchw on 2 different Opteron cpus NightStrike
10:10 Supporting subreg style patterns shmuel gutl
09:28 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC Coding Conventions typo Gerald Pfeifer
08:40 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Richard Biener
04:21 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Daniel Santos
03:13 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Daniel Santos

August 15, 2016
19:00 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Prasad Ghangal
14:21 GCC 6.2 Status Report (2016-08-15) Jakub Jelinek
14:15 GCC 6.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
11:36 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment André Hentschel
10:56 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Richard Biener
10:47 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Florian Weimer
00:16 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Jeff Law

August 14, 2016
22:36 gcc-7-20160814 is now available gccadmin
16:07 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: New CA mirror Gerald Pfeifer
07:49 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Trevor Saunders
07:46 Re: Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Daniel Santos
06:20 Help with implementing Wine optimization experiment Daniel Santos

August 12, 2016
21:36 Re: [RFD] Extremely large alignment of read-only strings Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:50 Re: [RFD] Extremely large alignment of read-only strings Thorsten Glaser
20:40 Re: [RFD] Extremely large alignment of read-only strings Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:33 Re: [RFD] Extremely large alignment of read-only strings H.J. Lu
20:02 Re: [RFD] Extremely large alignment of read-only strings Thorsten Glaser
09:42 Re: [avr] fno-caller-saves and regression tests Georg-Johann Lay

August 11, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160811 is now available gccadmin
20:03 Re: Help with lra shmeel gutl
10:28 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Richard Biener
05:47 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Prasad Ghangal

August 10, 2016
17:41 Re: Help with lra Vladimir N Makarov
10:56 Re: Missing git tags for released GCC Martin Liška

August 09, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160809 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: Unused variable in avx512fintrin.h Jakub Jelinek
22:13 Unused variable in avx512fintrin.h David Wohlferd
15:14 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Aldy Hernandez
10:26 New CA mirror Tim Semeijn
09:07 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Richard Biener
05:36 Re: Help with lra shmeel gutl
05:36 [avr] fno-caller-saves and regression tests Senthil Kumar Selvaraj

August 08, 2016
18:22 GNU Tools Cauldron, 9-11 September 2016, Hebden Bridge UK Jeremy Bennett

August 07, 2016
22:36 gcc-7-20160807 is now available gccadmin
13:19 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Prasad Ghangal

August 06, 2016
14:20 Re: Mirror out of date Dan Derebenskiy
12:47 Re: Mirror out of date Gerald Pfeifer

August 05, 2016
23:22 Re: GCC Commit Stats [was: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp [...]] Jonathan Wakely
18:27 Re: GCC Commit Stats [was: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp [...]] Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:35 Re: GCC Commit Stats [was: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp [...]] James Greenhalgh
16:32 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Jeff Law
16:27 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Ian Lance Taylor
15:39 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:26 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Bernd Schmidt
15:25 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Jeff Law
14:06 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test James Greenhalgh
12:10 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Jonathan Wakely
12:06 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:16 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Janne Blomqvist
11:10 GCC 6.2 Status Report (2016-08-05) Richard Biener

August 04, 2016
22:36 gcc-6-20160804 is now available gccadmin
21:40 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:17 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test DJ Delorie
21:01 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test DJ Delorie
21:00 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:35 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:28 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test DJ Delorie
20:12 Re: [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:50 [GCC Steering Committee attention] [PING] [PING] [PING] libgomp: In OpenACC testing, cycle though $offload_targets, and by default only build for the offload target that we're actually going to test Thomas Schwinge
13:56 Motorcycle Owners List Barry Stacer
12:59 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Richard Biener
11:32 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Prasad Ghangal
10:53 Re: gcc-4.9-20160803 is now available Richard Biener
09:25 Re: gcc-4.9-20160803 is now available Gerald Pfeifer

August 03, 2016
22:35 gcc-4.9-20160803 is now available gccadmin
20:47 Re: Change of assumptions/behavior with -ftree-vrp in gcc 4.8+? Vikram Mulukutla
19:12 Re: Change of assumptions/behavior with -ftree-vrp in gcc 4.8+? Andrew Pinski
19:10 Re: Change of assumptions/behavior with -ftree-vrp in gcc 4.8+? Andrew Pinski
19:06 Change of assumptions/behavior with -ftree-vrp in gcc 4.8+? Vikram Mulukutla
13:17 Re: GCC 4.9.4 Released ronp6543 at gmail dot com
08:04 GCC 4.9 branch is now closed Richard Biener
08:03 GCC 4.9.4 Released Richard Biener
08:00 Copyright assignment to FSF Laurent Thévenoux

August 02, 2016
22:36 gcc-5-20160802 is now available gccadmin
21:10 Re: Help with lra Vladimir Makarov
20:41 Help with lra shmeel gutl
08:59 Re: [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Richard Biener

August 01, 2016
14:52 [gimplefe] "Unknown tree: c_maybe_const_expr" error while parsing conditional expression Prasad Ghangal
11:36 Re: Two suggestions for gcc C compiler to extend C language (by WD Smith) David Brown
10:29 Re: Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++? Markus Trippelsdorf
10:16 Potential bug about the order of destructors of static objects and atexit() callbacks in C++? lh mouse


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc